February 5, 2012

CPC vs. CPL? Does that even make sense?

On page 83 of the recent proposed rulemaking from the department of Education you will find:

Several negotiators were concerned about the impact of the proposed language on an institution’s Internet-based activities.  Negotiators asserted that the HEA permits advertising and marketing activities by a third party, as long as payment to the third party is based on those who “click” and is not based on the number of individuals who enroll.  The Department agrees and does not believe that the proposed regulatory language would prohibit such click-through payments.

Please explain to me how CPC makes more sense than cpl, other than with non-internet (call center) leads.  Anyone who can manage an efficient CPL program can just as easily manage a successful CPC program.  Still don’t see why internet driven CPL is being called into question especially for the lead provider who have zero interaction with the prospect who sought out, then filled out the lead form for the school.

 

To access the complete 500+ page doc Click: 

http://www.ed.gov/news/student-aid-rules-protect-borrowers-and-taxpayers

then click on the link in box on right: notice of proposed rulemaking.

Notice of proposed rulemaking

 

With the 505+ page document the government put out many are still scratching their heads.  Many comments are whirling as people speed read the proposed rules. 

Click: http://www.ed.gov/news/student-aid-rules-protect-borrowers-and-taxpayers

to visit the page then look for the box on the right with the link to the document notice of proposed rulemaking.

“Sector Under Siege?”,

An article with that title was published on the website Inside Higher

Education.  In their opinion the gainful employment rule is expected to be excluded from next

week’s education proposal.   The article outlines that the Office of Management and Budget

included a note in the Federal Register concluding that the DOE’s proposed program integrity

rules could have a major economic impact, a designation that would require the DOE to

strengthen the evidence necessary to justify the need for the regulation.  Furthermore, the article mentions

that the designation is believed to be a major reason why the DOE has (according to reports

from several sources Thursday, though unconfirmed by department officials directly) decided

to omit the gainful employment proposal from the proposed regulations expected to be

released next week.  This if the outcome follows the assumption will bring smiles to many of the faces I saw at last

weeks CCA.  Lets hope!

CCA starts tomorrow in Vegas

It will interesting to see & feel the atmosphere at the CCA this week with all of the regulatory overhang.  With so much up in the air I am sure the conversations and opinions will be flowing.  With lead generators, schools and service providers mingling and drinks flowing its sure to be entertaining. 

e look forward to catching up with many of you.

208