February 5, 2012

Apollo group’s position paper on Higher education

The Current State of Higher Education in America and the Vital Role of Proprietary Colleges and Universities

Gregory W. Cappelli Co-Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Group and Chairman of Apollo Global

America is at a crossroads with respect to how the nation’s higher education system will adapt to meet the needs of today’s learners.  

At Apollo Group, we are concerned that the country will not meet the national education goals set forth by President Obama without an adaptable postsecondary system that operates differently than it has in the past–a system that embraces diversity and innovation.

More Americans than ever need a college degree and are seeking access to higher education. 

Jobs today require higher education, yet out of 132 million people in the labor force, more than 80 million don’t have a bachelor’s degree, and 50 million adults have never even started college. These individuals are increasingly looking for ways to remain competitive and advance in their careers in today’s global economy.

Those seeking access to higher education are less prepared than in the past and require greater support.

High school dropout rates are now approximately 55% in many major cities like New York and Los Angeles. Even more concerning, many students who do graduate cannot perform at the twelfth grade level in reading or math.

Over 70% of today’s students are now categorized as “non-traditional” students.

Our colleges and universities must meet the needs of today’s learners who have families and professional obligations that make it incrementally challenging to pursue a college degree.

Traditional colleges and universities are the backbone of the U.S. higher education system, but they alone cannot meet the country’s needs.

This system, which is exclusive by design, was built to meet the needs of a different era when only a small portion of the nation’s workforce needed a college degree. Today’s globally competitive, knowledgebased economy requires a more broadly educated society.

President Obama has set forth three important goals for the U.S. higher education system which are critical to the country regaining its standing as a global leader in education.

 On a sobering note, we estimate that without proprietary schools, meeting these goals would cost U.S. taxpayers more than $800 billion over the next ten years.

Accredited, degree-granting proprietary institutions, which have been a strong source of innovation, play a critical role in the future of education.

These institutions provide access to students who previously have been left behind by or excluded from the traditional higher education system. Well managed proprietary institutions can meet the demand for education at a significantly lower cost to society.

Link to the complete white paper: http://www.apollogrp.edu/Investor/Reports/Higher_Education_at_a_Crossroads_FINALv2[1].pdf

Nelnet to pay $55 Million to settle suit

Nelnet will pay $55-million to settle its share of a whistle-blower lawsuit that accuses it and several other lenders of defrauding taxpayers of more than a billion dollars in student-loan subsidies.

The settlement, which Nelnet announced late Friday, is the latest to result from a lawsuit brought by Jon H. Oberg, a former Education Department researcher, on behalf of the federal government.

Rerad the article: http://chronicle.com/article/Nelnet-to-Pay-55-Million-to/123912/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

Many for profit schools are taking the recent shot across the bow as a catalyst to intiate self policing of practices

Clearly the Senate hearings and public outcry relating to the for profits have resulted in many schools taking notice of the potential exposure and negative attention that could arise if their schools are targeted.  Management teams are weary and Board members are nervous.  Investors as usual are still fearful.  The result is an increased push toward aggressive self policing and investigation.  The thought is that we need do a better job of internal checks and balances to be able to identify and remove any & all bad apples before someone else does it publicly.   The good news is that third parties can help  schools do this on a consistent basis.  Feel free to reach out to us if you would like some assistance in this area, we would be happy to give free advice and introductions.

  If you are a third party and would like to be listed as a service provider in this area please email us: info (at) forprofitedu.com with your URL, contact info and references.  Sorry companies without validated references WILL NOT be listed!

Senate hearings GAO investigator finds all 15 student interactions were provided with fraudulant information or deceptive practices

During the Senate hearing the investigator/auditor claims that all schools involved (12) had fraudulent interactions with the fake students/mystery shoppers with hidden cameras.  They pointed out 3 good interactions.  In his summary he said he believes that the general practices of for profits are fraudulent and misleading, under his breath he did mention it was not a scientific and statistical survey.  This is clearly a biased testimony siding with the opinion of who engaged him to do so. 

6 out of 15 times the prospective student was not allowed to speak with financial aid unless and until the signed the enrollment forms, even after repeatedly asking to speak with financial aid.

Many of the Senators however have been stressing the benefits of the for profits and the real goal of graduation rates and they have in some instances stressed how well the for profits in their states have done in comparison to the non profits.

One came out and suggested that the scrutiny be not solely on the for profits but also on the traditionals: http://help.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=fc74d517-7ca8-438a-9a24-b5c1d1f12752&groups=Ranking

During the closing remarks it became clear that the accrediting agencies are next on the list to be scrutinized

Al Franken’s clearly biased agains for profit edu and some may wonder if his campaign coffers are being filled by non profits

Sen Al Franken today sat on his pedestal and ranted that non profits/traditional should not be investigated as the for profits are…  why not?  If the majority of pell grants and title IV go to the non profits/traditionals why not look at them as well.  Clearly the non profits/traditionals have been lobbying to keep themselves clear from any investigation.  Why doesn’t someone mystery shop some of the traditionals???

dont miss todays Senate hearing at 10:00 on recruitment practices in forprofit education

Full Committee Hearing – For-Profit Schools: The Student Recruitment Experience

Committee:

Senate Committee on Health Education Labor and Pensions

Date:

Wednesday, August 04 2010, 10:00 AM

Place:

106 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Witnessesreturn to top

Panel I

  • Gregory Kutz , Managing Director, Office of Forensic Audits and Special Investigations, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Arlington, VA

Panel II

  • David Hawkins , Director of Public Policy and Research, National Association for College Admission Counseling, Arlington, VA
  • Michale McComis , Executive Director, Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges, Arlington, VA
  • Joshua Pruyn , former Admissions Representative, Alta College, Inc., Denver, CO

EDMC selection of double positive as agency of record leave most industry veterans scratching their heads…

When it was announced that EDMC had selected the small firm double positive as it’s agency of record, many people seemed confused.  At leadscon last week many of the industries largest marketers and agencies were wondering how that happened.  Other however seemed to clearly understand.  The theory isthat they were selected because of the advertising.com connection, in essence a senior exec of double positive was previously the point man for the apollo exclusive with advertising.com.  Clearly EDMC as well as the online unit are being run by former UoP exec’s and thus they pushed the deal thru with doublepos.  Interesting though we all know how the UoP deal with ad.com turned out….. hence their purchase shortly thereafter of aptimus.  Could they be simply doing a try and buy with double positive…

208