<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding why for-profits are growing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forprofitedu.com/admissions/understanding-why-for-profits-are-growing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forprofitedu.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:03:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.forprofitedu.com/admissions/understanding-why-for-profits-are-growing/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forprofitedu.com/?page_id=336#comment-113</guid>
		<description>You nailed it in when you state &quot;You need to not think about yourself here as you are NOT the typical student growing to these schools.&quot; It&#039;s often the biggest mistake we make in terms of aligning marketing, admissions, student support and academics. The win-win scenario is when the marketing, enrollment and academic environment is designed to support those who are looking for a enriched experience, those who are just looking to get their degree and get out, and those who don&#039;t know either way. By &quot;tagging&quot; each lead (nothing wrong with that term) with a growing profile throughout their experience in the school we can use technology to apply the appropriate conversation and support environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it in when you state &#8220;You need to not think about yourself here as you are NOT the typical student growing to these schools.&#8221; It&#8217;s often the biggest mistake we make in terms of aligning marketing, admissions, student support and academics. The win-win scenario is when the marketing, enrollment and academic environment is designed to support those who are looking for a enriched experience, those who are just looking to get their degree and get out, and those who don&#8217;t know either way. By &#8220;tagging&#8221; each lead (nothing wrong with that term) with a growing profile throughout their experience in the school we can use technology to apply the appropriate conversation and support environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Epstein</title>
		<link>http://www.forprofitedu.com/admissions/understanding-why-for-profits-are-growing/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Epstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forprofitedu.com/?page_id=336#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Good read, but I think there is a flaw in the overall process.  One could argue the attrition rates schools experience is directly tied to the way the &#039;marketing machines&#039; lack information (maybe do not care) about a prospective student&#039;s needs and wheter or not the degree program meets those needs. 

Perhaps you summed it up concisely &quot;often a degree is a degree type thinking.&quot; Couple that with an aggressive marketing model and one can easily see where root cause of the problem exists: We are too busy taking care of the urgent (the school&#039;s bottom line) versus taking care of the important (the student&#039;s bottom line).    

I think we need to be more concerned about the needs of the individual sitting in front of a computer and instead of referring to them as a &quot;lead,&quot; we start thinking about them in terms of potential long term relationships.   

 I truly believe the education sector can reach a better solution that leads to a win-win scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read, but I think there is a flaw in the overall process.  One could argue the attrition rates schools experience is directly tied to the way the &#8216;marketing machines&#8217; lack information (maybe do not care) about a prospective student&#8217;s needs and wheter or not the degree program meets those needs. </p>
<p>Perhaps you summed it up concisely &#8220;often a degree is a degree type thinking.&#8221; Couple that with an aggressive marketing model and one can easily see where root cause of the problem exists: We are too busy taking care of the urgent (the school&#8217;s bottom line) versus taking care of the important (the student&#8217;s bottom line).    </p>
<p>I think we need to be more concerned about the needs of the individual sitting in front of a computer and instead of referring to them as a &#8220;lead,&#8221; we start thinking about them in terms of potential long term relationships.   </p>
<p> I truly believe the education sector can reach a better solution that leads to a win-win scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
